Re: Packaging and installation

To: Albert den Haan <mvkjqa4i@umail.corel.com>
Cc: lsb-discuss@lists.linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: Packaging and installation
From: Matt Wilson <msw@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 12:51:09 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010514125109.C10425@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3B000434.C882BBA1@corel.com>; from mvkjqa4i@umail.corel.com on Mon, May 14, 2001 at 12:13:40PM -0400
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010261201520.14654-100000@violet.jayhawks.net> <[🔎] 3AF8AA93.65FE7937@optushome.com.au> <[🔎] 3AF8AA93.65FE7937@optushome.com.au> <[🔎] YQqolLAQBu$6Ewrb@thewolery.demon.co.uk> <[🔎] 3B000434.C882BBA1@corel.com>

Everyone should read the current wording - we changed it last week.

http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/~checkout~/lsb/spec/gLSB/package/package.sgml?rev=1.6&content-type=text/plain

Cheers,

Matt

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Packaging and installation spec wording
  - From: Doug Beattie <dbb@caldera.com>

References:
- Re: Packaging and installation
  - From: Glenn McGrath <bug1@optushome.com.au>
- Re: Packaging and installation
  - From: "Anthony W. Youngman" <wol@thewolery.demon.co.uk>
- Re: Packaging and installation
  - From: Albert den Haan <mvkjqa4i@umail.corel.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Packaging and installation
Next by Date: some comments on the 0.9 spec
Previous by thread: Re: Packaging and installation
Next by thread: Packaging and installation spec wording
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread