Re: X Proposal
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 22:20:56 -0500
From: "Robert W. Current" <current@hel-inc.com>
I propose X, in a full useable implementation be a "Level 2" LSB
compliant standard.
This will allow LSB "Level 2" to be more useful to software developers
who wish to provide X applications.
Do we really think that any distributions will not be shipping X
libraries? Personally, I can't believe it. X is simply too
fundamental. Certainly the default case will be that X will be
supplied.
I don't think the complexity and the resulting user confusion about
"Level 1" vs "level 2" requiring applications, and "level 1" vs "level
2" requiring distributions, is worth it.
-Ted
Reply to:
- References:
- X and LSB
- From: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@transmeta.com>
- Re: X and LSB
- From: "Robert W. Current Jr. Ph.D." <current@hel-inc.com>
- Re: X and LSB
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@cs.loyola.edu>
- Re: X and LSB
- From: "Robert W. Current" <current@hel-inc.com>
- Re: X and LSB
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@cs.loyola.edu>
- Re: X and LSB
- From: "Robert W. Current" <current@hel-inc.com>
- X Proposal
- From: "Robert W. Current" <current@hel-inc.com>