Re: RFC
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 10:08:51PM -0500, djb@redhat.com wrote:
>
> Well, damn....not all ISVs need bash, either. What's your point? Most
> do need X. Deal.
Could there be profiles of LSB?
I see a number of purposes where X is not needed, notably the
server market. On the other hand I do agree that most Linux boxes
would need X, for ISVs to prepare their software in a portable way.
So we could have
1. LSB graphical (with X)
2. LSB shell (without x)
I note that from a customer view it would not make sense to want to
install a package requiring X, if X was not already installed.
So in practice it would not matter if X was not installed
on such a system.
Keld Simonsen
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC
- From: Jeffry Smith <jsmith@alum.mit.edu>
- References:
- Re: RFC
- From: "Robert W. Current, Ph.D." <current@hel-inc.com>
- Re: RFC