On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Dan Kegel wrote:
> That's a bit harsh. Why should the LSB discourage apps from using pthreads?
> Is it because it's too hard to list the things that must be obeyed
> to have a pthread app that is portable to both Linux and other OS's?
> I must be missing something.
> Is it just that I'm thinking at the source-code level, not at the
> installing-binary-packages level?
The only complete documentation we have is the pthreads spec. We don't have a
"what differs from pthreads" document yet, so we thought it was best not
to imply that everything works just like pthreads on any other system.
Stuart R. Anderson firstname.lastname@example.org
Metro Link Incorporated South Carolina Office
5807 North Andrews Way 129 Secret Cove Drive
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Lexington, SC 29072
voice: 954.660.2500 voice: 803.951.3630
fax: 954.938.1982 SkyTel: 800.405.3401