Re: Final version of a Logo
The URL for the LSB should be included. What was the URL again? ;)
Matthew
Nicholas Petreley wrote:
> I'm not sure that should be part of the logo itself
> (meaning part of the design), but IMO it should definitely
> be part of what's required to appear right next to the logo
> in some standard way. Has anyone defined the various
> categories of compatibility and test requirements yet?
> Suggested them? If so, point me to them. If not I'll keep
> on it.
>
> -Nick
>
> * Simon Epsteyn (seva@fnal.gov) [000920 15:21]:
> > Should the logo mention the version and possibly platform?
> >
> > May be something like:
> >
> > Build for Linux
> > LSB 1.0 x86
> >
> > If this is something you will be looking for when you buy an application in
> > the store at least version and platform seems important.
> >
> > /Simon
> >
> > On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Nicholas Petreley wrote:
> >
> > > Here is the final version of one of the Logos
> > >
> > > http://www.gatherround.com/j/Template?File=viewpic.html&u=105486&a=105952&p=1000000000001603276&Sequence=1
> > >
> > > -Nick
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> **********************************************************
> Nicholas Petreley Caldera Systems - LinuxWorld/InfoWorld
> nicholas@petreley.com - http://www.petreley.com - Eph 6:12
> **********************************************************
> .
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-discuss-request@lists.linuxbase.org
> with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org
--
Matthew Cunningham
Tel: 415.354.6617 | Fax: 415.546.9931
E-Mail: matthew@olliance.com
http://www.olliance.com
Reply to: