[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: File Systems.

On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Nicholas Petreley wrote:

> So even if Red Hat doesn't want to make this move, *someone* should. 
> Consider that a challenge to all the distro representatives here. ;)

The flip side is changing to FHS 2.0, then FHS 2.1, then LSB 1.0 would
cause ongoing customer pain rather then a one-time event, and would likely
make folks frustruated with the LSB.


|            "Who is John Galt?" - Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand		      |
|                                                                             |
|  Linux Application Development  --  http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad   |

Reply to: