Re: [gopher] Gophernicus 1.2-beta & virtual hosting
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, 23:21:01 EEST, Walter Vermeir <walter@wikizine.org> wrote:
[blah blah about Gopher not having vhosts]
> This explains a lot. It seems that I had an different definition of the
> concept "virtual hosting". Then it is logical "that it does not work".
You're right. And you're wrong. It works just fine, but all vhosts share a common root menu. You'll just have to be creative... :-D
>
> I will (at least for now) not use this virtual hosting. A gopher link is
> still a URL. I find it very important that a url always point to the
> same spot.
All URL's point exacly where they should point, it's just the shared root menu that requires a bit of fiddling around..
> In any case, that makes things more simpler, and that is
> where it is all about with gopher, keeping it simple.
I agree, and that's why I don't really use the vhosting for anything...
> I like your visitor counter ;)
:-D. It was sooo 90's that I just had to do it. Now all I need is a "Best browsed with Lynx" -banner.
- Kim
_______________________________________________
Gopher-Project mailing list
Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project
Reply to: