Bug#733489: python-apt: Improve 'Dependency' and 'BaseDependency' to get target package versions that satisfy dependencies
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:06:15PM +0100, Michael Vogt wrote:
> From e751078fb9a532a3e8ef411e88d95adbe05ea0a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michael Vogt <mvo@debian.org>
> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 21:36:26 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] add pyflakes test
>
> ---
> tests/test_pyflakes.py | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tests/test_pyflakes.py
>
> diff --git a/tests/test_pyflakes.py b/tests/test_pyflakes.py
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7404987
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/test_pyflakes.py
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +#!/usr/bin/python3
> +# -*- Mode: Python; indent-tabs-mode: nil; tab-width: 4; coding: utf-8 -*-
> +
> +# Partly based on a script from Review Board, MIT license; but modified to
> +# act as a unit test.
You really need to include the original copyright statement and the license
here, otherwise you violate the license. If the original code does not
include the license or a copyright statement above it, it might not be
distributable at all, as the license clearly says:
The *above* copyright notice and *this permission notice* shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
(I just added some emphasis)
I'd even say that including the copyright notice *below* the license terms
is wrong, as the license clearly says *above*. But not including them is
definitely wrong.
We don't want legal issues.
--
Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member
See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.
Please do not top-post if possible.
Reply to: