[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#561852: marked as done (apt: Method http has died unexpectedly (undefined symbol:))

Your message dated Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:38:55 +0100
with message-id <c64043e61002190638l4ac50b77s111df21c41eb315a@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#561852: apt: Method http has died unexpectedly (undefined  symbol:)
has caused the Debian Bug report #561852,
regarding apt: Method http has died unexpectedly (undefined symbol:)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
561852: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561852
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.25
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity: grave

Hi guys. the system show me this message when i try to update it, 

Zen2:/home/ramon# apt-get update
0% [Conectando a ftp.debian.org (130.89.149.226)]/usr/lib/apt/methods/http: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/apt/methods/http: undefined symbol: _Z14maybe_add_authR3URISs
E: Method http has died unexpectedly!            
E: El subproceso http devolvió un código de error (127)



-- Package-specific info:

-- apt-config dump --

APT "";
APT::Architecture "i386";
APT::Build-Essential "";
APT::Build-Essential:: "build-essential";
APT::Install-Recommends "1";
APT::Install-Suggests "0";
APT::Acquire "";
APT::Acquire::Translation "environment";
APT::Authentication "";
APT::Authentication::TrustCDROM "true";
APT::NeverAutoRemove "";
APT::NeverAutoRemove:: "^linux-image.*";
APT::NeverAutoRemove:: "^linux-restricted-modules.*";
Dir "/";
Dir::State "var/lib/apt/";
Dir::State::lists "lists/";
Dir::State::cdroms "cdroms.list";
Dir::State::userstatus "status.user";
Dir::State::status "/var/lib/dpkg/status";
Dir::Cache "var/cache/apt/";
Dir::Cache::archives "archives/";
Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache "srcpkgcache.bin";
Dir::Cache::pkgcache "pkgcache.bin";
Dir::Etc "etc/apt/";
Dir::Etc::sourcelist "sources.list";
Dir::Etc::sourceparts "sources.list.d";
Dir::Etc::vendorlist "vendors.list";
Dir::Etc::vendorparts "vendors.list.d";
Dir::Etc::main "apt.conf";
Dir::Etc::parts "apt.conf.d";
Dir::Etc::preferences "preferences";
Dir::Etc::preferencesparts "preferences.d";
Dir::Bin "";
Dir::Bin::methods "/usr/lib/apt/methods";
Dir::Bin::dpkg "/usr/bin/dpkg";
Dir::Log "var/log/apt";
Dir::Log::Terminal "term.log";
DPkg "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true";
DPkg::Tools "";
DPkg::Tools::Options "";
DPkg::Tools::Options::/usr/sbin/apt-listbugs "";
DPkg::Tools::Options::/usr/sbin/apt-listbugs::Version "2";

-- /etc/apt/preferences --


Explanation: Pinned by apt-listbugs at Mon Dec 07 01:00:34 -0430 2009
Explanation:   #559135: gedit-latex-plugin: installation fails
Package: gedit-latex-plugin
Pin: version 0.2rc2-2
Pin-Priority: 1000

Explanation: Pinned by apt-listbugs at Tue Dec 08 22:23:03 -0430 2009
Explanation:   #547038: Still dash vs bash problems
Package: bash
Pin: version 4.0-4
Pin-Priority: 1000

-- /etc/apt/sources.list --


# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 r1 _Etch_ - Official i386 NETINST Binary-1 20070820-20:21]/ etch contrib main 


# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 r1 _Etch_ - Official i386 NETINST Binary-1 20070820-20:21]/ etch contrib main 

deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib 
deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib 

# deb http://debian.unesr.edu.ve/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib  
# deb-src http://debian.unesr.edu.ve/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib  


# deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/synce/ubuntu/ hardy main 
# deb-src http://security.debian.org/ unstable/updates main contrib non-free 

# deb http://people.debian.org/~stigge/packages/ ./ 
# deb-src http://people.debian.org/~stigge/packages/ ./ 

# deb http://mirror-01.cantv.net/debian/ sid main non-free contrib 

# deb http://mirror-01.cantv.net/debian-security/ sid main non-free contrib 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-686-bigmem (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_VE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_VE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  debian-archive-keyring        2009.01.31 GnuPG archive keys of the Debian a
ii  libc6                         2.10.2-2   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1                       1:4.4.2-5  GCC support library
ii  libstdc++6                    4.4.2-5    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

apt recommends no packages.

Versions of packages apt suggests:
pn  apt-doc                       <none>     (no description available)
ii  aptitude                      0.6.1.3-3  terminal-based package manager (te
ii  bzip2                         1.0.5-3    high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  dpkg-dev                      1.15.4.1   Debian package development tools
ii  lzma                          4.43-14    Compression method of 7z format in
ii  python-apt                    0.7.13.4   Python interface to libapt-pkg
ii  synaptic                      0.63       Graphical package manager

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi George Danchev!

Seems like the BTS doesn't like me sometimes as i unfortunately
never get your reply (and a few other messages). :/

> I wonder if the resetted shared object versioning has something to do
> with it, e.g:
> apt < 0.7.24 libapt-pkg- libc6.9-6.so.4.8.0
> apt = 0.7.24 libapt-pkg- libc6.9-6.so.4.8.1
> and then again:
> apt = 0.7.25 libapt-pkg- libc6.9-6.so.4.8.0
mh. Good idea. In a very aggressive caching environment maybe…
Lesson learned: We should not do such version-hick-hack again. ;)

Anyway, i can't reproduce the failure, Michael hasn't seen it and
you seems to be unable to reproduce it also:
I am therefore closing this bug now (to actively contribute in
reducing the rc-bug count for squeeze), but everybody should feel
free to reopen it if it is reproducible and/or at least reappears!

So long: thanks to everyone involved in this bugreport!


Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

David Kalnischkies

--- End Message ---
Reply to: