> "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <jackyf.devel@gmail.com> writes: > > Hi Luca, thanks for look. > > Luca Bruno wrote: > You only analyzed the speed part of your changes, which is amazing. > But, what about the memory/resources used? > Cache memory is consumed by arrays/lists of small struct's, which previously has fields of > type map_ptrloc, where sizeof(map_ptrloc) == 4. In 'nommap' they contain (<type>)* fields, > which has the same 4 bytes on 32-bit arches and 8 bytes on 64-bit ones. > > So, I assume that it will be only a regression in memory size on 64-bit arches, but I > don't consider this as problem because 64-bit arches usually have large amounts of RAM, > and additional 8-32 MiB of heap doesn't make a concern. > Well it's killing my ram then. What changes for other tools other than apt-get? For example, apt-cache? -- http://syx.googlecode.com - Smalltalk YX http://lethalman.blogspot.com - Thoughts about computer technologies http://www.debian.org - The Universal Operating System
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature