[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#313041: marked as done (apt: APT::Default-Release does not honor synonymous release names)



Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2005 12:32:02 -0700
with message-id <20050611193202.GK8278@alcor.net>
and subject line Bug#313041: apt: APT::Default-Release does not honor synonymous release names
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2005 12:26:21 +0000
>From tjacobs-kw-reportbug.e56379@codegnome.org Sat Jun 11 05:26:21 2005
Return-path: <tjacobs-kw-reportbug.e56379@codegnome.org>
Received: from mxsf40.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.172] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Dh549-0002gb-00; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 05:26:21 -0700
Received: from mxip16a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip16a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.146])
	by mxsf40.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5BCPnIq027915
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 08:25:50 -0400
Received: from 24-205-108-213.rno-cres.charterpipeline.net (HELO penguin.codegnome.org) (24.205.108.213)
  by mxip16a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 11 Jun 2005 08:25:50 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.93,191,1115006400"; 
   d="scan'208"; a="1180984125:sNHT16217380"
Received: by penguin.codegnome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 6E10523DD1; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 05:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Todd A. Jacobs" <tjacobs-kw-reportbug.e56379@codegnome.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apt: APT::Default-Release does not honor synonymous release names
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 05:25:48 -0700
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20050611122548.6E10523DD1@penguin.codegnome.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
	HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: apt
Version: 0.5.28.6
Severity: important


If APT::Default-Release is set to a release name such as "sarge" or 
"etch," it doesn't complain, but it doesn't work right, either. It seems 
to only expect "stable," "testing," or "unstable." When I attempted a 
dist-upgrade with the following:

    #/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/70debconf
    APT::Default-Release "sarge";

it tried to upgrade from sid. Setting the default release to stable 
instead of sarge seemed to resolve the problem.

-- Package-specific info:

-- apt-config dump --

APT "";
APT::Architecture "i386";
APT::Build-Essential "";
APT::Build-Essential:: "build-essential";
APT::Default-Release "stable";
Dir "/";
Dir::State "var/lib/apt/";
Dir::State::lists "lists/";
Dir::State::cdroms "cdroms.list";
Dir::State::userstatus "status.user";
Dir::State::status "/var/lib/dpkg/status";
Dir::Cache "var/cache/apt/";
Dir::Cache::archives "archives/";
Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache "srcpkgcache.bin";
Dir::Cache::pkgcache "pkgcache.bin";
Dir::Etc "etc/apt/";
Dir::Etc::sourcelist "sources.list";
Dir::Etc::vendorlist "vendors.list";
Dir::Etc::vendorparts "vendors.list.d";
Dir::Etc::main "apt.conf";
Dir::Etc::parts "apt.conf.d";
Dir::Etc::preferences "preferences";
Dir::Bin "";
Dir::Bin::methods "/usr/lib/apt/methods";
Dir::Bin::dpkg "/usr/bin/dpkg";
DPkg "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true";

-- (no /etc/apt/preferences present) --


-- /etc/apt/sources.list --

#deb copy:///cdrom/ sarge main

######################################################################
# Security
######################################################################
deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib non-free

######################################################################
# Stable
######################################################################
deb http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ sarge main contrib non-free
deb-src http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ sarge main contrib non-free

######################################################################
# Testing
######################################################################
deb http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ etch main contrib non-free
deb-src http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ etch main contrib non-free

######################################################################
# Unstable
######################################################################
deb http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free

######################################################################
# Other
######################################################################
#deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian/ experimental main

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                     1:3.4.3-13   GCC support library
ii  libstdc++5                  1:3.3.5-13   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 313041-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2005 19:32:36 +0000
>From mdz@debian.org Sat Jun 11 12:32:36 2005
Return-path: <mdz@debian.org>
Received: from mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DhBie-0000UQ-00; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 12:32:36 -0700
Received: from mizar.alcor.net ([68.66.78.251]) by mta10.adelphia.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with ESMTP
          id <20050611193203.BPNP17140.mta10.adelphia.net@mizar.alcor.net>;
          Sat, 11 Jun 2005 15:32:03 -0400
Received: by mizar.alcor.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C99213BF58; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 12:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 12:32:02 -0700
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
To: "Todd A. Jacobs" <tjacobs-kw-reportbug.e56379@codegnome.org>,
	313041-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#313041: apt: APT::Default-Release does not honor synonymous release names
Message-ID: <20050611193202.GK8278@alcor.net>
References: <[🔎] 20050611122548.6E10523DD1@penguin.codegnome.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20050611122548.6E10523DD1@penguin.codegnome.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: 313041-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 05:25:48AM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.28.6
> Severity: important
> 
> 
> If APT::Default-Release is set to a release name such as "sarge" or 
> "etch," it doesn't complain, but it doesn't work right, either. It seems 
> to only expect "stable," "testing," or "unstable." When I attempted a 
> dist-upgrade with the following:
> 
>     #/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/70debconf
>     APT::Default-Release "sarge";
> 
> it tried to upgrade from sid. Setting the default release to stable 
> instead of sarge seemed to resolve the problem.

This is as intended, and all of the examples in the documentation use the
proper names.

-- 
 - mdz



Reply to: