Bug#175340: marked as done (Example tagfile.py is broken)
Your message dated Fri, 30 May 2003 19:44:09 -0400
with message-id <20030530234409.GA4972@alcor.net>
and subject line Fixed in 0.5.4.9+
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2003 20:14:42 +0000
>From shorty@debian.org Sat Jan 04 14:14:33 2003
Return-path: <shorty@debian.org>
Received: from p3e99065f.dip.t-dialin.net (salem.getuid.de) [62.153.6.95] (f942e7467bc3ad1951faf800c2507c16)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Uugi-0000ht-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 14:14:33 -0600
Received: by salem.getuid.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1352F2A243; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 20:56:42 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 20:56:42 +0100
From: Christian Kurz <shorty@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Example tagfile.py is broken
Message-ID: <20030104195642.GA21100@salem.getuid.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.10
Mail-Copies-To: never
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: python-apt
Version: 0.5.4.4
Severity: normal
Hi,
the example tagfile.py won't work when it's run because it looks for:
|apt/lists/_org_ftp.debian.org_ftp_dists_potato_main_binary-i386_Packages
Please change the example so it can be run like the other examples.
Thanks.
Christian
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux salem 2.4.19 #1 Wed Dec 4 19:02:50 CET 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro
Versions of packages python-apt depends on:
ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2-3 0.5.4 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii apt-utils [libapt-inst-libc6. 0.5.4 APT utility programs
ii libc6 2.3.1-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii python 2.2.2-4 An interactive object-oriented scr
-- no debconf information
--
Life's most urgent question is: what are you doing for others?
Martin Luther King, Jr.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 175340-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 May 2003 23:44:13 +0000
>From mdz@csh.rit.edu Fri May 30 18:44:12 2003
Return-path: <mdz@csh.rit.edu>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19LtXg-0007Jz-00; Fri, 30 May 2003 18:44:12 -0500
Received: from 216-15-124-77.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([216.15.124.77] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4)
id 19LtXf-0005dk-00
for 175340-done@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 30 May 2003 19:44:11 -0400
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19LtXe-0001Jv-00
for <175340-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 30 May 2003 19:44:10 -0400
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 19:44:09 -0400
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
To: 175340-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixed in 0.5.4.9+
Message-ID: <20030530234409.GA4972@alcor.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@alcor.net>
Delivered-To: 175340-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
I forgot to use dpkg-buildpackage -v when building python-apt 0.5.5, so
while this is noted in the changelog, the bug didn't get closed.
--
- mdz
Reply to: