Bug#119559: new field for package relations
retitle 119559 New relation: Upgrade-To:
severity 119559 wishlist
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote on Wed Dec 26, 2001 um 01:03:03AM:
> > I guess because of that. But how should I enforce an update of kvdr
> > then? I do not want to set direct dependency, since it is not a real
> > dependency, but a conflict to an ancient version and an update of the
> > application is appropriated.
> Correct. In the presence of complicate OR groups the time required to
> evaluate all the possible solutions is very high (the problem is NP), so
> it doesn't, and won't.
I see. Then I propose to introduce a new package description field:
Which means, (on Upgrade-To: foo (>= 1.2-3)) if you have installed foo,
then apt-get will force upgrade to at least version 1.2-3 or remove foo.
> involves an OR group - which is the worst possible situation. I advise
> that you remove the cycle, or perhaps try provides - the provides logic is
> a little bit more resistant to cycles.
There is no good way to force the wished behaviour of apt. I do not want
to force the user to install a package, but if he installs it, it should
be at least the specified version.
"Es freut mich doch immer wieder zu hoeren, das RTFM heutzutage echt total
out ist. Zum Glueck hab ich bei meinem Arbeitsplatz im AKW Muelheim-Kaerlich
eine GUI-Reaktorkontrolle. Das gibt zwar ab und an nen CORE-Dump, aber hey,
ich hab nichtmal die Schulungsunterlagen durchgelesen." Daniel Moehwald