[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#95116: failed autobuild of python-numeric_17.1.2-4 (m68k): conflicting build-depends



Michael Schmitz writes:
 > > How can I fix this in python-numeric? On a recent unstable system I
 > > have both blas-dev and lapack-dev installed. Or do the build
 > > dependencies of blas-dev and lapack-dev, and apt doesn't detect this?
 > 
 > Sorry if I wasn't perfectly clear about the details:
 > 
 > The dependencies of blas-dev (-> blas1) and lapack-dev (-> lapack) did
 > conflict for me. apt refused to install either blas-dev or lapack-dev. 
 > 
 > >  > Unpacking lapack (from .../lapack_2.0.1-2.1_m68k.deb) ...
 > >  > Unpacking lapack-dev (from .../lapack-dev_2.0.1-2.1_m68k.deb) ...
 > 
 > That's the lapack versions, I have no idea what blas versions were
 > current at that time. I can have another try at installing both blas1 and
 > lapack (current versions) to see if that changed. 

$ dpkg -l blas1 lapack blas-dev lapack-dev apt
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name           Version        Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii  blas1          1.0-6          A set of building blocks for performing vect
ii  lapack         3.0-5.1        a comprehensive set of linear algebra routin
ii  blas-dev       1.0-6          A set of building blocks for performing vect
ii  lapack-dev     3.0-5.1        a comprehensive set of linear algebra routin
ii  apt            0.5.3          Advanced front-end for dpkg

that's installed together on my system. So I assume I can close the
report, because it's resolved in the most recent version.



Reply to: