[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Compiling Gnome-APT on a fresh Slink box



Hi,

I was just compiling Gnome-APT on a freshly installed Slink box in
preparation for a CD set but occurred some problems:

Now type `make' to compile Gnome Apt Frontend
make
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/gnome-apt-0.3.1'
cd . && autoheader
configure.in:60: AC_TRY_RUN was called before AC_ISC_POSIX
make all-recursive
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/gnome-apt-0.3.1'
Making all in src
make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/gnome-apt-0.3.1/src'
Making all in pixmaps
make[4]: Entering directory `/tmp/gnome-apt-0.3.1/src/pixmaps'
make[4]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/gnome-apt-0.3.1/src/pixmaps'
Making all in gdeb
make[4]: Entering directory `/tmp/gnome-apt-0.3.1/src/gdeb'
c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include -DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H -I/usr/lib/gnome-libs/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -DG_LOG_DOMAIN="\"GDeb\""  -DGDEBRC=\""/usr/share/gdeb/gdebrc"\"  -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-unused  -DGNOME_ENABLE_DEBUG=1 -c main.cc
main.cc: In function `int main(int, char **)':
main.cc:75: passing `char *' as argument 2 of `gnome_init(char *, argp *, int, char **, unsigned int, int *)'
make[4]: *** [main.o] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/gnome-apt-0.3.1/src/gdeb'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/gnome-apt-0.3.1/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/gnome-apt-0.3.1'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/gnome-apt-0.3.1'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

Jason already assumed yesterday that some Gnome API might have changed.
That's why I didn't use my slink/potato system this time.  The error
is also present in Slink like you can see.

I hope one of you can fix this problem.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
Whenever you meet yourself you're in a time loop or in front of a mirror.

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.


Reply to: