Bug#52082: marked as done (apt: C++ configure problem on m68k)
Your message dated Mon, 6 Dec 1999 15:45:31 -0700 (MST)
with message-id <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.991206154040.22351B-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>
and subject line Bug#52082: apt: C++ configure problem on m68k
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 1999 22:26:19 +0000
Received: (qmail 22974 invoked from network); 6 Dec 1999 22:26:18 -0000
Received: from demokrit.nikoma.de (212.122.129.5)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Dec 1999 22:26:18 -0000
Received: from tokaimura.nikoma.de (tokaimura.nikoma.de [212.122.129.6])
by demokrit.nikoma.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA13263;
Mon, 6 Dec 1999 23:26:26 +0100
Received: from skeeve.dhis.org (mail@dialin4.pg5.hbg.nikoma.de [213.54.4.4])
by tokaimura.nikoma.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA21994;
Mon, 6 Dec 1999 23:26:15 +0100
Received: from cts by skeeve.dhis.org with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 11v5II-00008c-00; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 22:03:38 +0100
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 22:03:38 +0100
From: "Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org>
To: Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apt: C++ configure problem on m68k
Message-ID: <[🔎] 19991206220338.A522@skeeve.dhis.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i
Sender: "Christian T. Steigies" <cts@nikocity.de>
Package: apt
Version: 0.3.15
checking host system type... m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
checking for m68k-linux-c++... no
checking for c++... c++
checking whether the C++ compiler (c++ ) works... configure: error:
installation or configuration problem: C++ compiler cannot create executables.
I do have g++ installed and I think its also configured correctly (no expert):
cts@aahz:/build/source/main/apt-0.3.15>g++ -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/2.95.2/specs
gcc version 2.95.2 19991109 (Debian GNU/Linux)
Is there something wrong with my autoconfigure?
Ciao,
Christian.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 52082-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 1999 22:45:34 +0000
Received: (qmail 11536 invoked from network); 6 Dec 1999 22:45:33 -0000
Received: from crash.ab.videon.ca (root@206.75.216.220)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Dec 1999 22:45:33 -0000
Received: from wakko.deltatee.com (mail@wakko.powersurfr.com [24.108.53.97])
by crash.ab.videon.ca (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id PAA12204;
Mon, 6 Dec 1999 15:45:31 -0700 (MST)
Received: from localhost (wakko.deltatee.com) [127.0.0.1] (jgg)
by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 2.11 #1)
id 11v6st-0005q6-00 (Debian); Mon, 6 Dec 1999 15:45:31 -0700
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 15:45:31 -0700 (MST)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ualberta.ca>
X-Sender: jgg@wakko.deltatee.com
To: "Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org>, 52082-done@bugs.debian.org
cc: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#52082: apt: C++ configure problem on m68k
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 19991206220338.A522@skeeve.dhis.org>
Message-ID: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.991206154040.22351B-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> checking host system type... m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
> checking for m68k-linux-c++... no
> checking for c++... c++
> checking whether the C++ compiler (c++ ) works... configure: error:
> installation or configuration problem: C++ compiler cannot create executables.
This is a stock autoconf test, so it is not a problem with APT.
If you look in config.log you should see the command configure executes -
likely you are missing libstdc++-dev or something necessary like that.
Jason
Reply to: