Re: Processed: It is not.
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Jason Gunthorpe writes:
> > Subject: It is not.
>
> Please elaborate. Just saying "It is not" does not give much info, IMHO.
Bug 32888 deals with the screwed up nature of the base package and is not
in any way related to APT or the text you gave. Please do not go around
randomly re-assigning bugs without any justification, you should have
filed a new bug that APT should default to No when it gives that
particular warning.
Jason
Reply to: