Re: Processed: It is not.

[Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>]

On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

> 
> On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Santiago Vila wrote:
> 
> > Jason Gunthorpe writes:
> > > Subject: It is not.
> > 
> > Please elaborate. Just saying "It is not" does not give much info, IMHO.
> 
> Bug  32888 deals with the screwed up nature of the base package and is not
> in any way related to APT or the text you gave. Please do not go around
  ^^^^^^^^^^

The submitter was using APT.

Bug #32888 deals with apt removing base, which was essential.

Other access methods do not allow the user to remove an essential package.
So this *is* certainly related to APT.

Thanks.

-- 
 "4526a48c7c3a9b1e5b85f6ba085fc356" (a truly random sig)