On Dec 17, Ben Gertzfield decided to present us with:
> What do you guys think? Since apt is in base, should it pre-depend on
> its libraries now?
Which made me wonder. Now that libapt is going to have its own
package, what will be in the "apt" package? apt-get? so
shouldn't the package be renamed "apt-get"? the fact that the
package name is "apt" gives the wrong idea that it contains a
full working replacement for dselect.
And the sign said the words of the prophets
are written on the subway walls and tenement halls
and wispered in the sounds of silence
pgp key in the web page
Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org