Package names
On Dec 17, Ben Gertzfield decided to present us with:
> What do you guys think? Since apt is in base, should it pre-depend on
> its libraries now?
Which made me wonder. Now that libapt is going to have its own
package, what will be in the "apt" package? apt-get? so
shouldn't the package be renamed "apt-get"? the fact that the
package name is "apt" gives the wrong idea that it contains a
full working replacement for dselect.
[]s,
|alo
+----
--
And the sign said the words of the prophets
are written on the subway walls and tenement halls
and wispered in the sounds of silence
http://www.webcom.com/lalo mailto:lalo@webcom.com
pgp key in the web page
Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org
Reply to: