Re: apt-get dummy installation
* "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ualberta.ca> wrote:
Jason> You don't appear to be using the new version of the library, it
Jason> does not print the 'note, a broken or grop' message. Make sure
Jason> you export LD_LIBRARY_PATH before running the binary if you did
Jason> not install the .deb
You are right (debian/rules binary did not work. $(BLD) was unset in
the apt target).
Ok. Wow, pretty cool.
Checking task-sgml
Package emacs19 has broken dep on liblockfile0
Package docbook-stylesheets-doc has broken dep on www-browser
Considering xemacs20-mule 0 as a solution to docbook-stylesheets-doc 1
Holding Back docbook-stylesheets-doc rather than change www-browser
Package docbook-stylesheets-doc has broken dep on httpd
Considering wn 0 as a solution to docbook-stylesheets-doc 1
Holding Back docbook-stylesheets-doc rather than change httpd
Package psgml has broken dep on emacs19
Considering emacs19 2 as a solution to psgml 1
Holding Back psgml rather than change emacs19
Package psgml has broken dep on emacs20
Considering emacs20 1 as a solution to psgml 1
Holding Back psgml rather than change emacs20
Package task-sgml has broken dep on docbook-stylesheets-doc
Considering docbook-stylesheets-doc 1 as a solution to task-sgml 9999
Reinst Failed because of www-browser
Package task-sgml has broken dep on psgml
Considering psgml 1 as a solution to task-sgml 9999
Reinst Failed early because of liblockfile0
Reinst Failed because of emacs19
Package task-sgml has broken dep on xemacs20
Considering xemacs20-mule 0 as a solution to task-sgml 9999
Re-Instated xemacs20-support
Re-Instated xemacs20-bin
Re-Instated libjpeg62
Re-Instated nas-lib
Re-Instated xpm4g
Re-Instated xemacs20-mule
task-sgml: Depends: docbook-stylesheets-doc but it is not going to be installed
It gave up on the psgml part of the or group and now installs the
xemacs20 part :-)
Well done Jason.
BTW: it fails on docbook-stylesheets-doc as it Depends: www-browser |
httpd
AFAIK, depending on a virtual package without giving a real
alternative first is discouraged (and should be fixed in this
package), but not forbidden by policy?
Ciao,
Martin
Reply to: