On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 19:24:57 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-12-06 08:28 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > > > However, as soon as libdrm 2.4.23 gets released (which should happen by > > the end of year, along with xserver-xorg-video-intel 2.14), I will > > prepare a new nouveau snapshot, and current git already requires X > > server 1.8 or later. > > The libdrm 2.4.23 release has already happened, earlier than I expected. > Since upstream broke the ABI (without changing soname, of course) as Sigh. Is there no way to convince them to bump soname when they do that? > well as the API of libdrm-nouveau, and a new nouveau snapshot depends on > the new API, I propose to proceed as following: > > - Upload libdrm 2.4.23 to experimental, renaming the libdrm-nouveau1 > package to libdrm-nouveau1a. > > - When the FTP masters accept libdrm 2.4.23, upload a new nouveau > snapshot and a new mesa package with commit c25fcf5aa¹ cherry-picked > from master. > > Does this sound like a reasonable plan? > Sounds ok to me, thanks. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature