Re: drm-snapshot: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

[Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>]

Hi Chris, some questions about this commit:

On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 00:52 +0000, Chris Lamb wrote:
> commit 1d9453586fd1712791ac9cae6e1c27cff6815d2a
> Author: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
> Date:   Thu Feb 5 00:04:24 2009 +0000
> 
>     Build new libdrm-nouveau1 and libdrm-nouveau1-dbg packages.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
[...]
> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> index cd99512..4abda2a 100644
> --- a/debian/control
> +++ b/debian/control
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/lib/drm-snapshot.git
>  Package: libdrm-dev
>  Section: libdevel
>  Architecture: any
> -Depends: libdrm2 (= ${binary:Version}), libdrm-intel1 (= ${binary:Version}) [amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386], ${misc:Depends}
> +Depends: libdrm2 (= ${binary:Version}), libdrm-intel1 (= ${binary:Version}) [amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386], libdrm-nouveau1 (= ${binary:Version}) [amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 powerpc], ${misc:Depends}
>  Description: Userspace interface to kernel rendering services (snapshot) -- dev files
>   This library implements the userspace interface to the kernel DRM services.
>   DRM stands for "Direct Rendering Manager", which is the kernelspace portion

Any particular reason for restricting the dependency on -nouveau1 to
these architectures?  The package itself is arch:any.

Do we want to also build it from libdrm for sid, and/or upload the
nouveau driver to sid and squeeze?

Cheers,
Julien