[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#468777: marked as done (man xorg.conf should mention "DynamicClocks")



Your message dated Sat, 01 Mar 2008 14:23:29 +0100
with message-id <47C958D1.2020600@ens-lyon.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#468777: man xorg.conf should mention "DynamicClocks"
has caused the Debian Bug report #468777,
regarding man xorg.conf should mention "DynamicClocks"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
468777: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468777
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.4.1~git20080131-1
Severity: normal

I found a description of DynamicClocks on
http://www.x.org/wiki/DynamicClocks.

It should be part of xorg.conf.

-- 
GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen Interessen!
Jetzt dabei sein: http://www.shortview.de/?mc=sv_ext_mf@gmx



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Dr. Markus Waldeck wrote:
>> Isn't this radeon specific? 
>>     
>
> If this is the case the problem is solved!
>   

I can't find anything about DynamicClocks in Xserver's source, and
Google always refers to radeon/ati. So yes, this really seems radeon
specific.

Closing now.
Brice



--- End Message ---

Reply to: