[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#437355: marked as done (dexconf: don't add Protocol/Device options in the mouse section by default)



Your message dated Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:17:01 +0200
with message-id <20080712101628.GA18223@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Re: cloning 259080, tagging -1, tagging -2, reassign 259080 to xserver-xorg-core ... ... ...
has caused the Debian Bug report #437355,
regarding dexconf: don't add Protocol/Device options in the mouse section by default
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
437355: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=437355
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

The configuration for GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd is mostly identical,
however, there is a difference in how the mouse is setup.

Basically, on hurd-i386, the Device should always be "/dev/mouse" and
the Protocol be "osmouse". ZAxisMapping should not be set,
Emulate3Buttons can be, depending on debconf.

Unfortunately, I'm no debconf wizard, so I hope the changes are not
overly complex and could be done relatively easily. It would be nice if
X would run out-of-the-box on hurd-i386. Feel free to ask questions, but
please CC me.


thanks,

Michael


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:7.3+3

On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 03:31:45 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

> retitle -1 dexconf: don't add Protocol/Device options in the mouse section by default
> 
Fixed a while ago, we don't add this any more.

Cheers,
Julien


--- End Message ---

Reply to: