--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Bad spanish translation on display selection during installation process
- From: Zamorano <zamorano@visualms.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:51:57 +0200
- Message-id: <20070531175157.4854.37721.reportbug@PSVOS01.VisualMS.local>
Package: installation
Severity: important
The translation to spanish of the description makes that a user who wants all the resolutions listed installed unmark all options; this makes the installation don't install any resolution in the X system, so X are not accesible without reconfiguration.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>, 426897-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#426897: Bad spanish translation on display selection during installation process
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:10:28 +0200
- Message-id: <20080712100955.GA18087@patate.is-a-geek.org>
- In-reply-to: <20070601193530.GA3594@patate.is-a-geek.org>
- References: <20070531175157.4854.37721.reportbug@PSVOS01.VisualMS.local> <20070601043953.GB9915@kheops.homeunix.org> <20070601063624.GE5427@dario.dodds.net> <20070601171414.GF9880@kheops.homeunix.org> <20070601193530.GA3594@patate.is-a-geek.org>
Version: 1:7.3+8
On Fri, Jun 1, 2007 at 21:35:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2007 at 19:14:14 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > > Hmm, as I've just noted in the bug log, this is not a question of the
> > > fidelity of the translation; it's a problem with the resulting behavior
> > > which is reported to be different from what's documented in both the English
> > > and Spanish debconf templates.
> >
> > Hmmmm, OK. So the point becomes: is the behaviour wrong...or the
> > wording of the debconf templates incorrect?
> >
> AIUI, the behaviour should be what's described by the debconf templates,
> but nobody has been bothered to look into what's going on inside
> xserver-xorg.postinst to understand why that doesn't work.
>
We haven't been asking this question for a while now, so I'm closing
this bug.
Cheers,
Julien
--- End Message ---