OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du dimanche 11 mai 2008, vers 17:29, Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> disait: > I think it's fine for experimental, as long as the packager is aware > that it'll need quite some work to keep all the bits together, not just > the initial packaging. > I don't expect things to settle down this year, FWIW. I have packaged drm-snapshot which creates libdrm2, libdrm2-dev, libdrm2-dbg and nouveau-kernel-source. I am now looking at packaging mesa. Unfortunately, nouveau development is not done in 7.0 branch, it is not even done in the same repository. This means another new source package. Maybe, I should rename binary package to state that they should be used only with nouveau. I mean, if someone installs libdrm2 from experimental, it will break every X video driver, except nouveau. Those packages will provide, replace and conflict with the original packages. Thanks. -- BOFH excuse #44: bank holiday - system operating credits not recharged
Attachment:
pgp_KYiMBs7Qb.pgp
Description: PGP signature