* David Nusinow wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:18:06AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > > * David Nusinow wrote: > > > New branch 'upstream-experimental' available with the following commits: > > > > I track the upstream repository directly in upstream-unstable > > (refs/tags/compiz-0.3.6 from the upstream repository). Do you think it's > > necessary to have all the autoconf stuff in the upstream-experimental branch? > > It seems to me to make merging much more difficult, since I'll pretty much > > only be merging debian into upstream branches and not vice-versa. > > How do you do prepare uploads that need to go to unstable when you've also > got a newer version in experimental? You're right, upstream-experimental and debian-experimental should be there, I just "hadn't gotten there yet" =). I was just commenting about the autoconf stuff in the upstream branches. I'd like to stick with keeping upstream branches identical to upstream release tags. > You're right about the autoconf stuff in the upstream-* branches, that > shouldn't be there. But I think it's useful to have the upstream version > that'll be uploaded to experimental in upstream-experimental. Do you want > me to remove the autogenerated autoconf stuff from the upstream-* > branch(es)? No need, I'll take care of it when I upgrade to the next upstream release. > - David Nusinow Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature