[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#279698: marked as done (xlibmesa-dri: [i830_dri] causes lockup on system shutdown)



Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:55:05 +0100
with message-id <45E31EF9.9000402@ens-lyon.org>
and subject line address invalid or ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package:  x-window-system
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8

Hello,

Every time I have a hardware reboot the machine (Dell with an i845 Extreme 
Graphics Accellerator) locks up.  I am running kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686 and 
libc6 version 2.3.2.ds1-18.

Oddly enough shutting the machine off and letting fsck remount the screwed up 
filesystem seems to "fix" the problem.  It's locked up twice in a row the 
same way, and in just the same way trying to start it again has worked both 
times.  I'm not going to be shutting it off much any more so I don't know how 
consistent that behavior will be...

Also I am sure that it didn't start right after I got the new version of 
x-window-system going.  Anyway, here are the relevent logs.  I will also 
submit a report to the XFree people.

Thanks,

Eric Dickner

/var/log/syslog
**********************************************************************************************
Nov  4 13:02:19 javagate kernel: [drm] AGP 0.99 Aperture @ 0xe0000000 128MB
Nov  4 13:02:19 javagate kernel: [drm] Initialized i830 1.3.2 20021108 on 
minor 0
Nov  4 13:02:19 javagate kernel: mtrr: base(0xe0020000) is not aligned on a 
size(0x180000) boundary
Nov  4 13:02:29 javagate kernel: [drm:i830_wait_ring] *ERROR* space: 130664 
wanted 131064
Nov  4 13:02:29 javagate kernel: [drm:i830_wait_ring] *ERROR* lockup
Nov  4 13:02:34 javagate kernel: [drm:i830_wait_ring] *ERROR* space: 128944 
wanted 131064
Nov  4 13:02:34 javagate kernel: [drm:i830_wait_ring] *ERROR* lockup
Nov  4 13:02:36 javagate kdm[435]: Abnormal helper termination, code 1, 
signal 0
Nov  4 13:02:36 javagate kdm[435]: fatal IO error 32 (Broken pipe)
Nov  4 13:02:36 javagate kernel: mtrr: base(0xe0020000) is not aligned on a 
size(0x180000) boundary
Nov  4 13:02:41 javagate kernel: [drm:i830_wait_ring] *ERROR* space: 0 wanted 
131064
Nov  4 13:02:41 javagate kernel: [drm:i830_wait_ring] *ERROR* lockup
Nov  4 13:02:42 javagate kdm[452]: IO Error in XOpenDisplay
Nov  4 13:02:42 javagate kdm[422]: Display :0 cannot be opened
Nov  4 13:02:43 javagate kernel: mtrr: base(0xe0020000) is not aligned on a 
size(0x180000) boundary
********************************************************************************************
/var/log/XFree86.0.log.old
(**) Option "dpms"
(**) I810(0): DPMS enabled
(II) I810(0): X context handle = 0x00000001
(II) I810(0): [drm] installed DRM signal handler
(II) I810(0): [DRI] installation complete
(II) I810(0): direct rendering: Enabled
Error in I830WaitLpRing(), now is 2521, start is 520
pgetbl_ctl: 0xffe0001 pgetbl_err: 0x49
ipeir: 0 iphdr: 7d8e0001
LP ring tail: 0 head: 10 len: 1f001 start 0
eir: 0 esr: 10 emr: ff7b
instdone: ffc1 instpm: 0
memmode: 0 instps: 424
hwstam: ffff ier: 0 imr: ffff iir: 0
space: 8 wanted 504
(II) I810(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel
(II) I810(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xd0b76000 at 0x40018000
************************************************************************************************


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Closing this bug since the submitter's address is invalid while other
people involved didn't reply to my ping within a month. If anybody ever
reproduces this problem, feel free to reopen.

Brice


--- End Message ---

Reply to: