[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#272661: marked as done (xfree86-common: want Xsession to use umask setting from /etc/login.defs)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:03:57 +0100
with message-id <45BB69DD.8050301@ens-lyon.org>
and subject line Bug#272661: xfree86-common: want Xsession to use umask setting from /etc/login.defs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: xfree86-common
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: normal

In /etc/login.defs I set umask to 002, and that works for logging in on
the console or remote via ssh. However, if I use {g,x,k}dm I keep
getting an umask of 022, because Xsession is started by the display
manager which has a default umask of 022. 

It seems that Xsession doesn't change the UMASK at all. I think it
should inherit the values from /etc/login.defs. But maybe this should be
done by the display manager, in which case this bug applies to {g,k,x}dm
and whatever other display managers Debian provides.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: LANG=nl_NL@euro, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL@euro

Versions of packages xfree86-common depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.4.30.5   Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils                   2.8.4      Miscellaneous utilities specific t

-- debconf information:
  xfree86-common/experimental_packages:

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Closing, as suggested by earlier comments (for instance because
libpam-umask is available now).

Brice

--- End Message ---
Reply to: