Bug#405639: Bug#406058: failed to load module kbd
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:27:22PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2007 at 13:21:54 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > So what should be done with this bug? Should it be merged with bug #405639?
> > Do you think it needs to be treated as RC independently of bug #405639?
> > (FWIW, I don't; smooth upgrades from unofficial backports are absolutely not
> > RC in my book.)
> >
> I've not been able to reproduce a case where having
> Depends: xserver-xorg-input-all | xserver-xorg-input,
> xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-1.0
> Recommends: xserver-xorg-input-all, xserver-xorg-video-all
> makes things worse than they currently are, so I would tend towards
> doing that. It fixes the issue with tasksel et al., and should ensure
> that aptitude tries as hard as possible to install the -all packages on
> upgrade and on initial install.
> I'd like to have your and/or David's OK before uploading that, though.
>
> I agree that breaking upgrades from backports of from pre-release etch
> is probably not RC, but I'm not sure other upgrade cases aren't broken
> right now (like upgrading from xfree86 to xorg using etch's aptitude,
> although I haven't tested that yet).
Looks good to me. Upload away. Hopefully we can get more testing with that
configuration before the release is out.
- David Nusinow
Reply to: