[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#392546: xserver-xorg-video-sis: Missing symbol causes X to barf



Package: xserver-xorg-video-sis
Version: 1:0.9.1-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi,

After upgrading to this version of xserver-xorg-video-sis, when I next 
restarted X, it got partway through loading, switched the video mode, 
and then died, leaving the console unusable.  I found the following 
message in the logs:

xdm.log.1:/usr/bin/X: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/sis_drv.so: undefined symbol: assert

It turns out that this version (or another recent one) added a call to 
assert(3) in the code.  But it did not include <assert.h>.  It still 
compiles, with an "implicit declaration" warning, but a reference to the 
symbol "assert" is left in the object.  Since assert(3) is a macro and 
not a function, "assert" cannot be resolved by the dynamic linker.  Thus 
X fails to load the module and pukes all over the console.

The fix is to add "#include <assert.h>" in src/sis.h. 

There are a few other "implicit declaration" warnings generated 
elsewhere in the code.  They aren't causing problems at present because 
the functions in question are actually functions, and their default 
declarations seem to be adequate.  But they might as well be fixed to 
avoid future problems.  So also add to src/sis.h:

#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17debian9
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages xserver-xorg-video-sis depends on:
ii  libc6                        2.3.6.ds1-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  xserver-xorg-core            2:1.1.1-9   X.Org X server -- core server

xserver-xorg-video-sis recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



Reply to: