* Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 05:19:10PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > * Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 03:02:42PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > > > > When running: > > > > > > > > compiz -replace > > > > > > > > from an xterm window, my X server crashes with this backtrace: > > > > > > > > Backtrace: > > > > 0: X(xf86SigHandler+0x89) [0x80b6849] > > > > 1: [0xffffe420] > > > > 2: X [0x81414a5] > > > > 3: X(Dispatch+0x19b) [0x8086b8b] > > > > 4: X(main+0x48e) [0x806e5de] > > > > 5: /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc8) [0xb7dc3ea8] > > > > 6: X(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0xad) [0x806d911] > > > > > > > > Fatal server error: > > > > Caught signal 11. Server aborting > > > > > > I get exactly the same. I'm running testing/etch with only compiz and > > > required dependencies pulled from unstable -> that is, X.org 7.0. AIUI, > > > compiz requires X.org 7.1, but the dependencies do not reflect this. > > > > Yes, compiz-core should depend on xserver-xorg-core (>= 2:1.1.1-9). Can you > > try that version and see if the problem persists? > > No more crash here ATM, but my Thinkpad is at IBM technical service so > I plugged the HD into my old Tecra (Savage card) and I get this > message: > > /usr/bin/compiz.real: No GLXFBConfig for default depth, this isn't going to work. > /usr/bin/compiz.real: Failed to manage screen: 0 > /usr/bin/compiz.real: No manageable screens found on display :0 > > As I said this is now a Savage card (no acceleration that I'm aware > of). Should I wait to get my TP back and give it another try with the > r300 card ? Yes, that's the error message you get when DRI is disabled. Compiz just won't run without DRI. I hope this fixes the problems you were seeing on the r300. - Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature