[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#391592: compiz-core: compiz crashes my X server



On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 05:19:10PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> * Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 03:02:42PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > > When running:
> > > 
> > > compiz -replace
> > > 
> > > from an xterm window, my X server crashes with this backtrace:
> > > 
> > > Backtrace:
> > > 0: X(xf86SigHandler+0x89) [0x80b6849]
> > > 1: [0xffffe420]
> > > 2: X [0x81414a5]
> > > 3: X(Dispatch+0x19b) [0x8086b8b]
> > > 4: X(main+0x48e) [0x806e5de]
> > > 5: /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc8) [0xb7dc3ea8]
> > > 6: X(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0xad) [0x806d911]
> > > 
> > > Fatal server error:
> > > Caught signal 11.  Server aborting
> > 
> > I get exactly the same. I'm running testing/etch with only compiz and
> > required dependencies pulled from unstable -> that is, X.org 7.0. AIUI,
> > compiz requires X.org 7.1, but the dependencies do not reflect this.
> 
> Yes, compiz-core should depend on xserver-xorg-core (>= 2:1.1.1-9). Can you
> try that version and see if the problem persists?

No more crash here ATM, but my Thinkpad is at IBM technical service so 
I plugged the HD into my old Tecra (Savage card) and I get this 
message:

/usr/bin/compiz.real: No GLXFBConfig for default depth, this isn't going to work.
/usr/bin/compiz.real: Failed to manage screen: 0
/usr/bin/compiz.real: No manageable screens found on display :0

As I said this is now a Savage card (no acceleration that I'm aware 
of). Should I wait to get my TP back and give it another try with the 
r300 card ?

-- 
Eric VAN BUGGENHAUT
ericvb@debian.org



Reply to: