* Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 07:42 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > * David Nusinow wrote: > > [...] > > > [1] xterm needs an update, and compiz should ship with 0.2 for example... > > > > compiz 0.2 needs metacity >= 2.15.21, which is very unlikely to go into etch > > according to the GNOME maintainers. I may take a look at the code to see how > > difficult it will be to patch it for the metacity that's going to go into > > etch. > > compiz could always be built without metacity theme support, couldn't > it? It probably can. While it's certainly not the optimal solution, I guess it's a good compromise for etch. - Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature