Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support

[Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>]

On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:23:23PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:12:33PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:49:34PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:35:08PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:19:29PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > > > > Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev).
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > (needs lib32ice first)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Um, why don't you focus your energies on proper multiarch support
> > > > > instead of trying to propagate hacks like this further than they need to
> > > > > be?
> > > > 
> > > > Wait, this is not proper multiarch?
> > > 
> > > No.
> > 
> > Can you point me to any of:
> > 
> >   a) documentation/description of the "right thing".
> 
> http://www.google.com/search?q=multiarch&btnI=I'm+Feeling+Lucky
> 
> >   b) current status / timeline.
> > 
> >   c) reason why everyone else (including glibc and gcc maintainers) seems to be
> >      following this scheme instead.
> 
> These two questions are left as an exercise to the reader.

Thank you for nothing.

-- 
Robert Millan

My spam trap is honeypot@aybabtu.com.  Note: this address is only intended for
spam harvesters.  Writing to it will get you added to my black list.