Bug#384204: 32-bit biarch support
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:49:34PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:35:08PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:19:29PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:22:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > > Patch attached for 32-bit biarch support (lib32sm6 and lib32sm-dev).
> > > >
> > > > (needs lib32ice first)
> > >
> > > Um, why don't you focus your energies on proper multiarch support
> > > instead of trying to propagate hacks like this further than they need to
> > > be?
> >
> > Wait, this is not proper multiarch?
>
> No.
Can you point me to any of:
a) documentation/description of the "right thing".
b) current status / timeline.
c) reason why everyone else (including glibc and gcc maintainers) seems to be
following this scheme instead.
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is honeypot@aybabtu.com. Note: this address is only intended for
spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.
Reply to: