* Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 08:47 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > > Is there anything stopping us from putting Mesa 6.5 and xf86-video-i810 > > in now? > > Well, the latter is in sid, that's the origin of the problem at hand. > > > Maybe 6.5 could temporarily stop providing the mesa-swrast-source package > > (hell, the latter could come from its own package) > > FWIW, that might be a good idea until the Mesa and xserver builds have > been completely decoupled. Then again, is anything else using > mesa-swrast-source at all? If not, the files could just be included in > the xserver tarball? $ grep-aptavail -F Depends,Build-Depends mesa-swx11-source $ apt-cache dumpavail | grep mesa-swx11-source Package: mesa-swx11-source Filename: pool/main/m/mesa/mesa-swx11-source_6.4.1-0.4_all.deb So I guess there's no harm in removing it. Cheers, Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature