[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#361908: patch



On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 01:52:16PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:11:48PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 03:50:54PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > Thirdly, it's completely wrong anyway.
> > 
> > Please provide your own fix. It makes more than half of the builds on
> > the buildd fail and I consider it as an NMU reason without more time to
> > wait according to developers reference 5.10.2.2.
> 
> The fix is to come up with a coherent set of servers that S/390 should
> build.  I'd say that this would be Xephyr, Xnest, Xvfb, and Xorg with
> the dummy driver.

I fully agree with this list and I'm going to implement it.

> You can NMU if you want, but NMUing for a non-release-candidate
> architecture with a fix you have already been told is incorrect is
> extremely hostile, and I'm sure the other teams will consider it as
> such.  But hey, we have equal rights to the upload queue, so I can't
> stop you.

Agreed. Bastian, calm the fuck down and let me do my work. NMUs are
generally appreciated, but I'm doing my best to keep this under control
without you flying off the handle at every bug these packages introduce.
I'll be fixing your bug when the fix is ready and not before. I promise
that'll be soon.

 - David Nusinow



Reply to: