On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:55:02AM +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:48:26AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 10:00 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:37:35PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > > > > > Known bug in xorg 6.9, try to go back to 6.8 if you can. > > > > > I don't know if 7.0 is ready or not (it is in experimental > > > > > but not yet built for PPC). > > > > > > > > I've fixed a lot of those problems in X.org CVS, I don't know if distro > > > > picked them up yet, though you'll need 7.0 to run the fixed radeon > > > > driver. > > > > > > This is not yet fixed in debian though, so right now we don't have a working X > > > in those cases. > > > > > > Dear X team, could you maybe comment on when this fix will be added to the > > > modular X tree, at least in the experimental version ? > > > > The patch is included in xserver-xorg-video-ati SVN but hasn't been > > uploaded to experimental yet. Ironically, it's incorrectly called > > 'ppc_fix.diff'. > > Xorg has switched to SVN? I have the CVS repository but I > never heard of a subversion one. > > Besides that Ben claimed that he had checked in patches to > Xorg's CVS tree IIRC. > > At least I can more or less understand subversion, I always > had a tremendous impedance mismatch with CVS :-) The Debian X maintainers use Subversion to maintain their packaging. Xorg upstream still uses CVS, although git seems to be the flavour of the week ...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature