Re: X.org Packaging Roadmap
>>>>> "david" == David Nusinow <david_nusinow@verizon.net> writes:
david> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 08:10:42PM -0300, Otavio Salvador
david> wrote:
>> Since we'll review all changes made by Ubuntu makes more sense
>> to me do it while import it from his repository. This make
>> simple for us and for users use a know base to work.
david> So are you saying you want to import each file
david> individually? We could do that, where when you import a
david> file, you basically say "I've checked over this file and
david> it's Ok to go in". The only problem is that in my last pull
david> of ubuntu's X.org package sources, there are ~638 changelog
david> lines devoted to fixes. That's a lot of changes to review,
david> and since few people have stepped up to volunteer to review
david> them, it could take a very long time.
Yes. I know is a lot of work but it need to be done by us.
>> Other issue could be have it uploaded to experimental without
>> review all include changes. I don't think this is right. IMHO,
>> we shouldn't upload a package without have sure what fixes are
>> included and why.
david> This is a good point.
Yes and that's the reason why we need to review the fixes.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
Reply to: