On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 12:18:29AM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 03:01:27 -0500, Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> said: > > Branden> Yes; I apologize for hastily dismissing your report. The > Branden> fix is probably a for and a break away, but I think I will > Branden> CC David Mosberger on this message, as he almost certainly > Branden> has more clues to bring to the table than I do. > > Branden> I wonder how many domains we should look for before we give > Branden> up. I get the feeling doing an ftw() on /proc/pci/pci is > Branden> not a good idea. Even doing as much as a readdir() feels > Branden> wrong, but maybe not. :-P > > Hmmh, my patch didn't change the behavior as far as domains are > concerned. The old code also looked only at domain 0, IIRC. > > I'm not terribly familiar with multi-domain machines. From what I > recall, the domain-changes to /proc/bus/pci were SPARC-specific and > I'm not sure whether that approach is the final answer. I cc'd Bjorn > Helgaas and Alex Williamson in case they want to comment, since they > have more experience with large/multi-domain Itanium machines. Bjorn and Alex, Can you comment on this problem? The full bug log is available at: http://bugs.debian.org/284111 -- G. Branden Robinson | Optimists believe we live in the Debian GNU/Linux | best of all possible worlds. branden@debian.org | Pessimists fear that this really is http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | the best of all possible worlds.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature