[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#327641: ACK



You're right at least in my case (bug 328024), it was not a bug in your
package. See transcription:

*------------------------------------------------------------------------*
Viriato:/# dpkg -D10 -i /tmp/xlibmesa-gl_6.8.2.dfsg.1-7_i386.deb

D000010: ensure_pathname_nonexisting `/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci'
(Leyendo la base de datos ...
133894 ficheros y directorios instalados actualmente.)
Preparando para reemplazar xlibmesa-gl 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6
(usando .../xlibmesa-gl_6. 8.2.dfsg.1-7_i386.deb) ...
Desempaquetando el reemplazo de xlibmesa-gl ...
D000010: tarobject ti->Name=`.' Mode=755 owner=0.0 Type=53(d)
ti->LinkName=`' na menode=`/.' flags=2 instead=`<none>'
D000010: ensure_pathname_nonexisting `/..dpkg-new'
D000010: ensure_pathname_nonexisting `/..dpkg-tmp'
D000010: tarobject ti->Name=`./usr' Mode=755 owner=0.0 Type=53(d)
ti->LinkName=` ' namenode=`/usr' flags=2 instead=`<none>'
D000010: ensure_pathname_nonexisting `/usr.dpkg-new'
D000010: ensure_pathname_nonexisting `/usr.dpkg-tmp'
D000010: tarobject ti->Name=`./usr/X11R6' Mode=755 owner=0.0 Type=53(d)
ti->Link Name=`' namenode=`/usr/X11R6' flags=2 instead=`<none>'
D000010: ensure_pathname_nonexisting `/usr/X11R6.dpkg-new'
D000010: ensure_pathname_nonexisting `/usr/X11R6.dpkg-tmp'
D000010: tarobject ti->Name=`./usr/X11R6/lib' Mode=755 owner=0.0
Type=53(d) ti-> LinkName=`' namenode=`/usr/X11R6/lib' flags=2
instead=`<none>'
D000010: ensure_pathname_nonexisting `/usr/X11R6/lib.dpkg-new'
D000010: ensure_pathname_nonexisting `/usr/X11R6/lib.dpkg-tmp'
D000010: tarobject ti->Name=`./usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2' Mode=644
owner=0.0 Ty pe=48(-) ti->LinkName=`'
namenode=`/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2' flags=2 instead=
`/usr/share/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2'
D000010: namenodetouse namenode=`/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2'
pkg=xlibmesa-gl
D000010: namenodetouse ...
useinstead=/usr/share/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2 c amefrom=<none>
pkg=fglrx-driver return /usr/share/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2
D000010: tarobject ... found in fglrx-driver
D000010: tarobject ... diverted, divpkg=fglrx-driver
D000010: ensure_pathname_nonexisting
`/usr/share/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2.d pkg-new'
D000010: ensure_pathname_nonexisting
`/usr/share/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2.d pkg-tmp'
dpkg: error al procesar /tmp/xlibmesa-gl_6.8.2.dfsg.1-7_i386.deb
(--install):
 no se puede crear `./usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2': No existe el fichero
o el dir ectorio
D000010: cu_installnew `/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2' flags=2
dpkg-deb: el subproceso paste fue terminado por la señal (Tubería rota)
D000010: ensure_pathname_nonexisting `/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci'
D000010: ensure_pathname_nonexisting running rm -rf
D000010: ensure_pathname_nonexisting `/var/lib/dpkg/reassemble.deb'
Se encontraron errores al procesar:
 /tmp/xlibmesa-gl_6.8.2.dfsg.1-7_i386.deb
*-------------------------------------------------------------------*

The problem was that the diverted path /usr/share/fglrx/diversions/
didn't existed so installation crashed. After creating it manually
(mkdir /usr/share/fglrx/diversions/), the installation went on smoothly.
Sorry for any incovenience and thanks for the time you spend maintaining
the package.

PS: I have a doubt, should I file a bug against dpkg or fglrx-driver (I
know this is not a Debian Package) for not having created the path?


		
______________________________________________ 
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo! 
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad 
http://correo.yahoo.es



Reply to: