On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:05:31AM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 04:46 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 11:38:05AM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > > On Fri, 2004-10-15 00:10:59 -0400, Michel Dänzer <daenzer@debian.org> > > > wrote in message <[🔎] 1097813459.4290.59.camel@admin.tel.thor.asgaard.local>: > > > > > > > > Let's get another random data point: does it also happen if you run > > > > xclock with -norender? > > > > > > No; with -norender, everything works as expected. > > > > Michel, can you tell me how to transform this data point into a Eureka > > moment? :) > > Not sure; it means the problem seems to be related to the RENDER > extension. Maybe the atimisc driver doesn't initialize that correctly. > It would still be interesting to know if the order of the screens > matters. Dear submitter, Can you please tell us if the order of the screens matters? -- G. Branden Robinson | People are equally horrified at Debian GNU/Linux | hearing the Christian religion branden@debian.org | doubted, and at seeing it http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | practiced. -- Samuel Butler
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature