[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 1002 - /



On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:31:59AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 05:16:07PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:05:44AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:50:03AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > Do you have a patch status update?
> > > 
> > > svn log svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86/branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
> > > 
> > > ...you should know how to do this.
> > 
> > a) it wasn't updated at the time,
> 
> Not true.  Your mail was dated "Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:50:03 +1100".
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r998 | branden | 2004-01-29 22:48:07 -0500 (Thu, 29 Jan 2004) | 2 lines
> 
> Update and rearrange.  The list of 4.3.0-1 items is now specific.

The mail had not arrived at the time. I'm sure you knew what I meant. If
you didn't, please search for another XFree86 maintainer if it is, as
you say, quite the critical piece of infrastructure.

> > b) you know full well I can't get svn:// out. Remember the endless
> > discussions about eventually getting it working through SSH?
> 
> Actually, I had forgotten.  However, you're a Debian developer now, so
> you have access to several machines, some of which should have svn
> installed, so you can always check the logs from there.

You have a memory like a sieve, and a selective one at that. And yes, I
could use it from any number of machines, but they're all in the US, and
I don't like triply-bouncing when I'm on 56k to begin with. It's kind of
hard to do anything interactive, really.

I asked for something that was not, as far as I could ascertain at the
time, done. It turns out it was, thanks to the tyranny of terrible
mailing lists (I believe the next commit was the relevant one - if it
wasn't, then a "no further progressions" was what I was after. I'm sure
you're smart enough to figure this out - if not, please refer to my
first paragraph.)

> The cumulative changelog is also updated every 24 hours, and is
> available via any web browser that understands HTTP and plain text.

Yes, every 24 hours. And when I checked, I couldn't see that it was
updated in Subversion. Would you care to thus explain how this paragraph
is at all relevant?

-- 
Daniel Stone                                                <daniels@debian.org>
Debian: the universal operating system                     http://www.debian.org

Attachment: pgpCZzyr7r26O.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: