[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#285309: xserver-xfree86 not upgrading correctly from xserver-xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 to 1-9



retitle 285309 xserver-xfree86: SEGV during upgrades from 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 to -9
tag 285309 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks

On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 02:20:20PM +0100, pachi@mmn-arquitectos.com wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8
> 
> The upgrade of this package to version 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9 fails with the
> following message:
> 
> Preconfiguring packages ...
>         Fallo al preconfigurar xserver-xfree86, con el código de salida 139
>         (Leyendo la base de datos ...
>         96586 ficheros y directorios instalados actualmente.)
>         Preparando para reemplazar xserver-xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 (usando
> .../xserver-xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb) ...
>         dpkg: error al procesar
> /var/cache/apt/archives/xserver-xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb
> (--unpack):
>          el subproceso pre-installation script devolvió el código de
> salida de error 139

My Spanish is pretty rusty, but I'd recongize the number 139 anywhere.  It
means a process exited due to a segfault.

> The problem can be solved installing the discover package, apparently
> needed for configuration. It couldn't automatically be solved as this last
> package is on the suggests list for the xserver-xfree86 package, not on
> depends.

I don't think your diagnosis is quite right.  You were the only person to
report this particular problem, so if the problem were this general,
there'd have been tons of reports.

I do know for a fact that discover 2.x has had some pretty awful SEGV
problems recently, but they've been fixed in the most recent upload or so.

On the other hand, the xserver-xfree86 maintainer scripts are written to
handle discover failing horribly.

So, we really don't know what is going wrong here.  Can you still reproduce
this bug?  Try removing discover.

Needless to say, Fabio and I did not see this problem, or we wouldn't have
released the package.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |      What cause deserves following if
Debian GNU/Linux                   |      its adherents must bury their
branden@debian.org                 |      opposition with lies?
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |      -- Noel O'Connor

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: