tag 263877 = upstream thanks On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 06:43:10PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 06:28:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 02:33:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 08:53:40AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 04:47:23AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > > > > > > Can someone please help me out with a better explanation of what the bug > > > > > being reported here actually is? "various display artifacts" is hopelessly > > > > > vague. > > > > > > > > I described the visual effect in my original submission. I'm attaching > > > > screenshots of them now. > > > > > > I wasn't really able to follow it, though; thanks for the screenshots. > > > > Does XTerm #196, in xterm 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8, make either of these any better? > > I can still reproduce the problem in mutt using the uxterm binary from that > package. > > e2832b71f5e85f1cd4447e7e3f34ee6a uxterm Thanks for following up. I'm sorry to hear the bug is still present. FYI, the MD5 checksum of uxterm is not all that useful for the type of bug you're reporting, as it's just a shell script wrapper around the xterm ELF executable. I generally take people's word for it if they tell me they're running a given version of a package. :) -- G. Branden Robinson | I just wanted to see what it looked Debian GNU/Linux | like in a spotlight. branden@debian.org | -- Jim Morrison http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature