Re: Xsession doesn't use umask setting from /etc/login.defs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Branden,
Branden Robinson wrote:
| On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 01:28:31PM +0200, Tomas Fasth wrote:
|
|> What I don't understand is why you think the umask preference
|> should be applied differently depending on the type of
|> interface the user choose to initiate an interactive session
|> with.
|
|
| I don't. Kindly stop putting words in my mouth, and re-read my
| original mail. If you can discuss this subject without indulging
| yourself in straw-man attacks like this, please follow-up with a
| more reasonable message.
I have re-read your mail and I beg you for pardon. I was wrong.
| And, by the way: X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me
| on replies.
I'm very sorry but I'm not perfect. My earlier reply did not cc:
you. Could you please wait for it to happen a second time in the
same thread before complaining? You seem a bit touchy about it.
I found the following when I was googling for X-No-CC:
~ From: Stepan Kasal
~ Subject: Re: Paragraph indentation suppression
~ Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 10:00:55 +0200
[...]
~ PS: I'm not sending cc to the original poster, as I'm scared by
~ this: X-No-CC: If you CC me on this list, I will feed you to
~ Branden Robinson. (It seems that Karl has already been fed.)
I couldn't but smile. "Oh no, please have mercy, don't feed me to
Branden!" Poor Karl :)
| Please get an MUA that respects Mail-Copies-To:.
Thanks for the advice, but I prefer Firefox for the time being. I
may try to persuade the Mozilla people to accept a patch. Can you
give me a reference to a RFC-draft or something equivalent?
Live in peace, Tomas
- --
Tomas Fasth <tomfa@debian.org>
GnuPG 0x9FE8D504
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBdBw+wYdzVZ/o1QQRAuYQAJ91qTyek/fp58fX3TSGWRUmc0oUZgCfVFyA
8iz8rKvhvF3QuEX0VL4nH/c=
=cKe+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: