On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 04:39:17PM -0400, Andrew Pimlott wrote: > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 04:57:37AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > [Are you subscribed to this list?] > > Do you mean to this bug? No, I haven't learned how to do that yet. No, I mean to the debian-x mailing list, to which all non-"quiet" bug traffic against xfree86, xft, xrender, and render packages go. > > On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 02:35:23PM -0400, Andrew Pimlott wrote: > > > Also, has anyone asked the X developers for a "soft" version of -dpi or > > > DisplaySize? It seems like a trivial feature. > > > > Sure; I've considered implementing it ("-softdpi") myself. So far, not > > enough round tuits for it. > > The patch by Gus (if you reverse the second half) looks like an > expedient solution, unless you think it will confuse people. That just changes one hard-coded default for another. I think -softdpi would be superior to both. -- G. Branden Robinson | It's extremely difficult to govern Debian GNU/Linux | when you control all three branches branden@debian.org | of government. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- John Feehery
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature