On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 04:39:17PM -0400, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 04:57:37AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > [Are you subscribed to this list?]
>
> Do you mean to this bug? No, I haven't learned how to do that yet.
No, I mean to the debian-x mailing list, to which all non-"quiet" bug
traffic against xfree86, xft, xrender, and render packages go.
> > On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 02:35:23PM -0400, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> > > Also, has anyone asked the X developers for a "soft" version of -dpi or
> > > DisplaySize? It seems like a trivial feature.
> >
> > Sure; I've considered implementing it ("-softdpi") myself. So far, not
> > enough round tuits for it.
>
> The patch by Gus (if you reverse the second half) looks like an
> expedient solution, unless you think it will confuse people.
That just changes one hard-coded default for another. I think -softdpi
would be superior to both.
--
G. Branden Robinson | It's extremely difficult to govern
Debian GNU/Linux | when you control all three branches
branden@debian.org | of government.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- John Feehery
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature