On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:45:18PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>
> On 2004.08.15 19:06, dean gaudet wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> >
> > > I'd say that's a bug in xdm, it should be at S95 or so.
> >
> > there are other S99 scripts as well... on my systems i find:
> >
> > S99fetchmail
> > S99rmnologin
> > S99stop-bootlogd
> > S99xdm
> >
> > it's really only by luck that S99stop-bootlogd is almost last. that's why
> > i suggested fixing bootlogd rather than trying to discover all the other
> > S99s and change them.
>
> But that is what should be done. Policy says that if you use non-standard
> start/stop levels, you have to discuss that with the sysvinit maintainer.
> Nobody appears to do that. Bootlogd is part of sysvinit, so it's start/stop
> level has been discussed with the maintainer, so it is correct. All the
> others are incorrect.
I asked you *months* ago what sequence number you thought xdm should use,
and I got no reply.