Bug#261854: marked as spam Bug#261854 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#261854: xlibs: some softlinks not made correctly, installer fails to upgrade)

To: "John D. Hendrickson" <jdh@hend.net>, 261854@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#261854: marked as spam Bug#261854 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#261854: xlibs: some softlinks not made correctly, installer fails to upgrade)
From: Daniel Stone <daniels@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:38:27 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040803043827.GI17302@fooishbar.org>
Reply-to: Daniel Stone <daniels@debian.org>, 261854@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 410F107B.4000006@hend.net>
References: <20040728162642.GP23526@fooishbar.org> <200407281601.i6SG1c4W011734@hend.net> <handler.261854.D261854.109103200328789.notifdone@bugs.debian.org> <[🔎] 410F107B.4000006@hend.net>

On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:11:39AM -0400, John D. Hendrickson wrote:
> I do not appreciate being called completely bogues.

I said the bug was completely bogus, not you.

-- 
Daniel Stone                                                <daniels@debian.org>
Debian: the universal operating system                     http://www.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#261854: marked as spam Bug#261854 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#261854: xlibs: some softlinks not made correctly, installer fails to upgrade)
  - From: "John D. Hendrickson" <jdh@hend.net>

Prev by Date: Bug#261854: marked as spam Bug#261854 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#261854: xlibs: some softlinks not made correctly, installer fails to upgrade)
Next by Date: Re: Please pass judgement on X-Oz licence: free or nay?
Previous by thread: Bug#261854: marked as spam Bug#261854 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#261854: xlibs: some softlinks not made correctly, installer fails to upgrade)
Next by thread: Bug#261854: marked as spam Bug#261854 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#261854: xlibs: some softlinks not made correctly, installer fails to upgrade)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread